Ain’t that a kick in the head? Or rather, a 9mm bullet.

Fallout: New Vegas has long been a favorite of mine, along with other titles such as those from the Mass Effect and Deus Ex franchises. Fallout always looked interesting to me; it being one of those games I’d see in a CD jewel case in Wal-Mart for $15, but I never ended up buying it. Back then, I had it in my mind that games like that weren’t any good.

Now I find myself regretting that judgment. Luckily, Bethesda gave away free copies of the first Fallout on Steam recently, so I’ll be able to give it a shot soon!

Of course, fast-forward to 2008, when Fallout 3 released, and I fell in love with the setting. I didn’t much care for the loose mechanics, dated graphics, or the mediocre DLC, but I still sunk countless hours into it.

So imagine my delight when Obsidian Entertainment’s Fallout: New Vegas came out. The promise of a game made by some of the folks behind the originals, with modern touches? How could I say no?

Hell, I still can’t say no.


Fallout New Vegas  VATS.png

V.A.T.S. is back, baby!

Fallout: New Vegas introduces some refinements to the franchise, fixing many of the problems that Bethesda created when they brought the turn-based RPG series to the first-person shooter era.

You can aim down the iron sights of your weapon, instead of the antiquated zoom function in Fallout 3. There are unique modifiers to gameplay in the form of traits, like Early Bird and Trigger Discipline. Reputation systems are expanded beyond the extremely polar Good and Bad Karma system, though Karma still is present. There are dozens more weapons and even ammo types to make use of, which also conform to those found in earlier Fallout games. An expanded crafting system allows players to not only make weapons, but chems and ammo as well. Obsidian also introduced Hardcore Mode, which adds survival elements that force you to monitor more than just health and radiation exposure; even making healing more complicated by reducing the effectiveness of stimpacks and forcing you to use doctor’s bags to heal limb damage.

What Obsidian Entertainment did was they took the framework of Fallout 3, and implemented many of the improvements that were introduced by Fallout 3‘s modding community, while adding in their own flair to craft a world that feels close to the source material.

That doesn’t mean it’s perfect; far from it, in fact. Real-time combat is much more fluid and useful, though there is still a great deal of wonkiness to it. Fighting with anything other than ranged weapons takes a great deal of guesswork. Playing a melee character in particular is much like playing Oblivion… Rough. There’s also significant input delay sometimes on the console versions, though I haven’t noticed the same issue on the PC.

Of course, just like in Fallout 3, V.A.T.S. tends to break the game a bit. You can use it to spot enemies that are far beyond the range afforded to you with your Perception skill on the compass, though the overpowered nature of it has been pared back a bit. You’re no longer near-invincible in V.A.T.S. in Fallout: New Vegas.

But what makes Fallout: New Vegas a truly unique experience isn’t the gameplay, it’s what you can do, and how you can go about it.

Options. Only a handful of NPCs are marked as essential in Fallout: New Vegas, which is a far cry from the Elder Scrolls games and Fallout 3, where pretty much anyone linked to a quest is invincible. Furthermore, many quests can be handled with limited to no violence at all, with things like your Speech skill playing a large role in how you get things done.

Fallout: New Vegas demonstrates how useful those previously ancillary skills are in the very beginning, providing you with multiple ways to gain an edge in your dealings in the introductory area, Goodsprings. If you choose to help out the locals, you can go about it as a solo effort, or you can use your various skills to obtain explosives, better armor, medical supplies, and enlist the help of the town.

Sure, not every quest is like that, but there’s far more depth to your dealings in Fallout: New Vegas than many other games I’ve played.


Fallout New Vegas  Wasteland.png

It isn’t much better than Fallout 3, but at least they tried

To say that Fallout: New Vegas looks rough would be a monumental understatement. It looked dated even in 2010, when it first hit store shelves. The console versions were easily the worst, with the PC barely edging them out with higher resolutions, though that had a similar effect as putting on glasses to help you see a lipstick-smothered pig better.

I know that sounds harsh, but it’s an ugly game, and as much as I love it, I just can’t lie y about it. Even so, Obsidian was working with what they had available to them, which consisted of the framework provided by Bethesda. Obsidian worked wonders with a dated engine and clunky mechanics in my opinion. They chose to ditch the oppressive green-tinted wasteland in favor of something that looks much less ugly, creating a wasteland in the west that looks somewhat livable.

Unfortunately, Bethesda’s open-world engines run about as well as a car that’s been sitting in a field for two decades. Fallout: New Vegas is still a buggy mess. The version playable on the Xbox One suffers from less hitches and crashes than I remember in earlier days, but it’s hard to not notice when terrain in the distance fails to render properly, or enemies spawn in walls during the main quest. Fallout: New Vegas is a rough diamond… You can definitely tell that something of quality is there, even though there’s little polish.


Fallout New Vegas  Welcome To Nipton.png

I’m sure everything is fine… Just fine…

I’m not sure if I can qualify much of what I’m about to say as “original”, but it’s new to the series once Bethesda got their hands on it. Obsidian Entertainment put the care of a company that is invested in the lore of setting into Fallout: New Vegas. Like Fallout 2, they chose a location that was close enough to be impacted by the events of those games proceeding it, without being tied inextricably to the previous entries.

Bethesda’s approach was very much the “let’s throw it all out the window and keep the stuff we like” type. Setting Fallout 3 on the east coast, roughly 200 years after the events of the Great War allowed Bethesda to do pretty much whatever the hell they wanted, and it worked for the most part. Obsidian seemed to take a ballsier (wow, that’s a word) tack by sticking closer to the source material, expanding on the already dense lore of the franchise.

And I have to say, I think it worked better this way. Fallout: New Vegas has much more personality within it, with a setting that makes sense in the context of a post-apocalypse age.

The societies you come across show that there’s an infrastructure that actually supports them. Farmers and ranchers are common across the Mojave, though there are still wasteland prospectors and raiders about. Gone are places like Rivet City and Megaton, which were held together by magical sources of food and clean water. Additionally, the Mojave isn’t a radioactive hellhole like the DC wasteland is, meaning that you aren’t going to be using up your stockpiles of Radaway and Rad-X constantly. It actually looks like people could live in the New Vegas area.

Fallout: New Vegas sells the idea that there could be a functioning society in the Mojave and beyond that isn’t at the mercy of an environment that is lethal at every turn. Sure, it may have been more interesting to explore Fallout 3 when you could run across raiders or supermutants every couple minutes, but at least it’s far more believable that the average Joe could enjoy a lifespan that’s longer than a bloatfly’s.


Fallout New Vegas  Handshake.png

Everyone wants a piece of New Vegas

Call it a cop-out if you want, but beginning in Fallout: New Vegas feels right to me. You’re treated to a horrifying-looking cutscene (think animatronics) where your character is shot in the face and left for dead, and you’re thrust into the search for that bastard.

Because, well… He shot you in the face and left you for dead. What more motivation do you need?

Of course, the rabbit hole gets much deeper and branches off into dozens of little nooks and crannies to explore once you get into it. Each new settlement you come across in the early hours provides a little more insight into what happened to you, and why, while throwing more and more side activities your way.

You’re essentially guided towards New Vegas along a fishhook path in your pursuit of the man in the checkered suit (seriously, who wears that crap?), and you’re definitely better off just going along for the ride. Walking too far north will almost certainly end poorly for you…

I don’t want to spoil anything for folks that have yet to play this almost decade old game, because I feel that the story itself is its strongest point. It’s safe to say that not only is there far more to the proceedings than initially meets the eye (it isn’t just a tale of revenge), but the sheer number of quality side content is baffling. Few games in this day and age accomplish what Fallout: New Vegas has done. The only game that I can think of that does as good of a job is The Witcher III: Wild Hunt.

Yeah, I’m comparing Fallout: New Vegas to The Witcher. It’s not only a broad area to explore, but it’s worth exploring to find all the neat, interesting side quests and characters.


Fallout New Vegas  Grey Areas.png

Don’t look a comically oversized souvenir dinosaur in the mouth

Perhaps one of the most significant changes comes at the cost of ditching the strict good and evil structure to making decisions. Fallout: New Vegas doesn’t put you in the shoes of being a character that needs to choose between kicking and petting the puppy. The folks you deal with on a regular basis have varying degrees of goodness to them, but there aren’t many (if any) saints or devils in the Mojave.

Even Caesar’s Legion, the New California Republic’s (NCR) enemy in the Mojave, isn’t entirely bad (though much of their behavior is reprehensible). They’re likely the most black-and-white faction in the wastes, dealing almost exclusively in absolutes. The NCR is probably the most relatable faction, though they’re easily the most corrupt and ineffective.

My point is that there’s very little good and bad to guide your decisions, and you are more than free to take the easy way out in many situations, if you’re willing to live with what you’ve done. An early quest involves you trying to weed out a person that sold someone to Caesar’s Legion, and while you can find the right person if you’re willing to put in the work, you can just as easily just pick a person at random to pin the crime on and still complete the quest.

That’s what Fallout: New Vegas does well. It presents the player with situations with a little context, then lets you decide what to do in a free manner.


Fallout New Vegas  Beginnings.png

A new start. Hopefully Obsidian gets the reins again!

I may be biased… Actually, I’m definitely biased here. I’ve already told you that I think Fallout: New Vegas is better than Fallout 4, but I just wanted to further cement in your mind the why of it.

Fallout: New Vegas is a flawed, yet enthralling game. It gives you all the tools to create a character and roleplay it as you wish, leaving behind Bethesda’s apparent obsession with family-motivated protagonists in favor of a tabula rasa approach. Obsidian Entertainment created a world that meshes well with established lore, and did well to improve on the framework that Bethesda created with Fallout 3, and I’d further assert that Fallout: New Vegas is one of the best games in the franchise.

Is it a must-own for everyone? Definitely not. It’s rough around the edges, and it’s dense as hell to get into. But for those that like that kind of experience, it’s a dream come true.

Plus, there’s cowboys, and robots, and even a cowboy robot.

Did you like this post? You should click “Like” if you did. Feel free to follow Falcon Game Reviews as well. You can also find Falcon Game Reviews on TwitterFacebookDiscord, or even send a direct email to!

Posted by Shelby "Falcon509" Steiner

I'm just a gamer that enjoys talking about my hobbies. I do a little more than that too. I love cooking, grilling, being outdoors, going target shooting, etc.


  1. I remember playing this a fair bit when it came out. The thing I remember noticing the most though was Matthew Perry’s god awful voice acting! It was just so stilted!

    Liked by 1 person


    1. Yeah, I wasn’t sure if I should mention his performance, but I figured that it was better left as a delightful surprise to those that have yet to try it.

      Liked by 1 person


  2. Fallout New Vegas is the only Fallout game I’ve never completed. It’s actually my least favorite of the new Fallout games, but I still got some enjoyment out of it. Nice review :).

    Liked by 2 people


    1. This is a pretty common point of view, I’ve seen. It appears that there are two camps for the new Fallout games, those that like Bethesda’s entries, and those that liked New Vegas.

      Thank you for reading by the way!

      Liked by 1 person


  3. Obsidian Entertainment was kind of rushed/sidelined with this title; something along the lines of they were working on a Fallout spin-off (turned-based, like the old ones). Bethesda contracted them to do New Vegas instead, with a limited timeline; they used the same engine of Fallout 3, had a limited cast of voice-actors, & had to adjust to New Vegas’ story.

    I actually enjoyed New Vegas more than Fallout 3 for some reason; the setting and factions really helped it stand out. The Hardcore difficulty was also a surprisingly awesome feature.

    Liked by 1 person


    1. This, I didn’t know. I’ll have to look into it further, but I’m busy planning more coverage of it in the form of writing about the DLC and perhaps a version of “What The Hell Happened In Fallout: New Vegas” like I did with Horizon: Zero Dawn.

      Liked by 1 person


  4. Something about the setting just didn’t grab me. Not sure what it was, maybe it was because I’ve been to Washington D.C. (and at the time I played New Vegas, I hadn’t been to Vegas yet), or maybe something else but I think I got about halfway through the story and stopped both times I’ve given it a shot. Someday, I’ll get around to actually finishing it.

    Liked by 1 person


    1. Fallout: New Vegas is a bit of an oddity. I didn’t cover it much in the review, but there’s a definite shift in tone and narrative about the time you get to New Vegas. The story can get lost easily at that point, because the path widens greatly once you get there. Instead of being funneled towards a goal, you’re presented with dozens of plot lines to pursue. I even had trouble with that in my most recent playthrough.

      Liked by 1 person


  5. TBH, Fallout 3 is way better then FNV but this game was so good when I played it at launch. It’s sad how Bethesda rushed FNV out and sideline Obsidian.

    Liked by 1 person


    1. I can understand feeling that way about Fallout 3. I may not share the sentiment, but I am planning on revisiting Fallout 3 sometime soon, just to make sure my memory isn’t tainted with my own biases.

      I seriously need to look into the Bethesda/Obsidian story too. I had no idea.

      Liked by 1 person


      1. I have to look into that story too, someone told me that Bethesda rushed them to complete FNV.

        I just think FO3 is way better because of atmosphere and that urban combat, FO3 is just so iconic and that’s why I think it’s way better but I have to revisit it too.

        Liked by 1 person


  6. […] But I’m not writing about that. I want to clear up some of the background of one of my favorite entries in the franchise, Fallout: New Vegas. […]



  7. Cracking review! I resisted Fallout for years, but finally waded in with Fallout 4 earlier this year during a Steam sale. I was hooked, pumping 200 hours in over the course of about 6 weeks.

    Then I stopped, because I had to start choosing sides. I still haven’t finished it, but I have made my decision how I’m going to end it. Then I’ve got all the DLC to play. I’ve enjoyed it so much I’ve purchased New Vegas too, so it looks like I’ll be playing them backwards!

    I can only hope Fallout 5 ditches the Creation(?) engine for something a little more robust, it is so janky.

    Liked by 1 person


    1. While I wouldn’t count on an open-world Bethesda game to not be a little janky, I have to give them the credit they deserve for doing what they do.

      I will say that there’s a bit in the story of Fallout: New Vegas where you start choosing sides, but there is an option to take your own path if you decide you don’t like the factions. It also ends without the option to continue playing, but only because the implications of completing the main story doesn’t leave many options for continued play.

      Thank you for reading by the way!



      1. No problem, I love your style. It’s nice to see “old games” being reviewed as well, which some of the bigger sites don’t really do much of. Some of us can’t play everything that comes out the day it is released, case in point, I’m about 10 years late to the Fallout party lol.

        I had heard Fallout 4 allowed you to carry on playing past the ending, which other entries in the series do not, but I’m not sure how I feel about that. I have enough open ended games in my life, in Fallout 4’s case I chose to lengthen the amount of time spent between missions, rather than rush to the end and keep playing. I think once I’m done, I’ll be done, so FNV shouldn’t be much different for me.

        Liked by 1 person


  8. […] In case you missed my review of the base game, take a moment to check it out here: Fallout: New Vegas Review […]



  9. […] In case you missed my review of the base game, take a moment to check it out here: Fallout: New Vegas Review […]



  10. […] Fallout: New Vegas avoided this problem with one, simple fix: the game ends after the final quest. Obsidian didn’t even attempt to reconcile player decisions to side with any of the many disparate factions, because you can’t see first-hand the results of your actions. It’s the easy way out, but it works fine. Far better than the attempt by Bethesda to make player decisions matter in Fallout 3‘s Broken Steel DLC. […]



  11. […] be a narrative masterpiece. We gamers need more than just story-heavy marvels like Firewatch and Fallout: New Vegas. We need games like DOOM, Cities: Skylines, and Just Cause 3; games that are fun to play, even […]



  12. […] original folks who developed the original franchise having their hands in not only spin-offs like Fallout: New Vegas, but also games like Wasteland 2. Sure, Wasteland 2 is a sequel to a game that inspired the Fallout […]



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.