Sometimes the worst part about multiplayer gaming (tabletop and video games) is the multi part.

I know it sounds strange out of context, but hear me out. Sitting down and playing a game with others can be downright infuriating, especially when cooperation is necessary. Hell, the same could be said for any endeavor that involves multiple people. Dealing with coworkers, doing group projects in class, and multiplayer gaming can all be as difficult to navigate as a minefield in some cases.

I can’t say that’d I’d be a font of knowledge or wisdom on the topic of cooperating with a group consisting of people with different skills and opinions, so this post may come off as a bit ranty. Regardless, I need to at least get some of this off my chest, and hopefully folks have some good advice to share.

What Brought All This On

My wife and I started playing D&D (5th edition) sometime in 2015 with a group of people my wife met through her work. In fact, I even touched a bit on the subject with my post Dungeons And Dragons Is My New Addiction. It started pretty well, with us creating our characters and learning more about the folks that we’d be playing the campaign with. We’d go on to complete one campaign, start another with the same group, and even begin a second with another set of folks.

But one group has taken off, where the other has faltered. One would think that the older group would be the one to continue going well, but that wasn’t the case.

Our inability for our first group to function cohesively came to a head in the form of a confrontation that Jennifer had with our group during a session that I was not to able to attend. An important moment in my character’s story took place, and Jennifer didn’t want me to miss out. So at 4:45pm (15 minutes from our normal ending time), when the group was gearing up to go fight a dragon and make an important character decision for me, Jennifer said she wanted to stop. The group had other plans and looked incredulously at her, as if she just offended them.

Our DM invited Jennifer and I to dinner so he could tell us that we need to compromise more with our group. That asking them to stop when they wanted to keep playing was unfair to them.

Were we being unreasonable to expect a little compromise from them? It was a thought that I struggled with for a while, until just today. One of our group members commissioned an artist to create a group picture for our DM to celebrate a year of playing D&D together, and he presented two layouts for us to vote on. My wife and I preferred the closeup, so naturally some of the others liked the other option better. Even before everyone got their votes in, two of our group members chose to individually text Jennifer to try to get her to change her mind, one of whom refused to make a decision because he supposedly liked both. Eventually he conceded and chose the first option, but we were eventually left with a tie.

We couldn’t even come to an agreement over a picture. The only thing that resolved the situation was me changing my vote to placate them.

Group Dynamics

Contrast this all with our second group, where we play together with our first group’s DM and a couple others. We’re consistently able to come to decisions as the result of both compromise and discussion. We decide based on what’s good for the group, even when role-playing matters are taken into consideration.

The key here is that our second group chooses to discuss and weigh our options instead of arguing. There’s no metagaming and no character conflicts. We actually get along together, even when we disagree.

It turns out that there’s a pattern to group dynamics. Healthy groups follow a certain path when developing: they form, storm, norm, and perform. This is based on the four phases of team development found in the text, Business Communication Process and Product by Guffey and Loewy. After groups form, they go through the process of determining roles and resolving any potential conflicts, or storming. Once a suitable group balance is struck, the team finds their norm. Here, conflicts are resolved and a “mutual interdependence is established” (44). Finally, the group performs by carrying out the task that they were formed to pursue.

The alternative is that a group might develop a groupthink mentality where conflict is avoided at all costs. There are a number of negative side effects for a group adopting this method, some of which can easily lead to unresolvable issues. Groupthink leads to individuals ignoring each other’s ideas, being disrespectful, and/or wasting the group’s time. It can be easy to adopt this method, because it defers any conflict until a later time, but unfortunately that conflict often crops up in irreversible ways.

Our first group fell into this trap because the majority of our group tries to avoid any conflict by glossing over potential problems. Discussion can’t take place without at least one member of the group taking the opinion of another personally. Disagreements are often viewed as an attack on someone else, not as a simple conflict. Differences in opinion are seen as an affront to the group. When Jennifer and I wanted to go to Summit Hall to drop off a prisoner as a mercy to him, our group immediately shut us down, claiming it’d be better to simply execute him since it’d be far out of the way from where they’d like to go. However, when our barbarian wanted to go south to do a personal quest, the group heartily agreed and welcomed the change.

The key is that the majority of the group generally agrees because they’re already friends, and are well acquainted with each other. Jennifer and I are outsiders in the group; we don’t fit. They work normal jobs, where we work and attend school. They spend their money on frivolous things, where we save for things we need. We’re drastically different to the point where while we want to role-play, they want mostly combat.

Our second group instead took the path laid out by Guffey and Loewy, by first getting to know each other, finding our common ground, developing our own group culture, and then (and only then) setting out on our adventure.

The Cold Truth

The fact of matter is that our first group is likely on the ropes. We probably won’t continue to play with that group because our disparate personalities don’t mesh and they’re unwilling to meet us halfway on anything. It makes me feel bad that something I enjoy so much has been tainted by poor behavior and our inability to find some common ground, but when something that’s supposed to be fun ceases to be, what’s the point?

When we brought this up previously, we were accused of being selfish. We aren’t having fun by consistently compromising to their benefit, but they’re enjoying it because they’re getting what they want. Is it selfish to withdraw from something that you don’t enjoy, at the expense of others? Perhaps, but not nearly a selfish in my opinion as forcing others to endure something they loathe to entertain yourself.

What do you think? Have you ever had an experience like this? What did you do to avoid this, or mend the situation?

Header Image Credit: BBC Bitesize

Did you like this post? You should click “Like” if you did. Feel free to follow Falcon Reviews as well. You can also find me on Twitter and even send me a direct email to!


Posted by Shelby "Falcon509" Steiner

I'm just a gamer that enjoys talking about my hobbies. I do a little more than that too. I love cooking, grilling, being outdoors, going target shooting, etc.


  1. I don’t do well with teams. I’ve tried playing some of my games online in multiplayer mode. Sometimes it was hilarious fun (thinking back on Dirt 3 and Need for Speed days), while others were horrendous (thinking Medal of Honour and Call of Duty). Even at work, I excel at doing things on my own, but when doing team work, my opinion is often overlooked and then the team deliverable is very often mediocre at best.

    Where I can relate the most to your situation was where I as an author decided in my infinite wisdom that joining a local writers club would be beneficial and help get my name out there. So I researched and found one, and discovered it was a group of writers who had not been published before, making me a kind of celebrity amongst them. I spent a few weeks with them, to discover this was more an editing club who loved critiquing other people’s work more than actually working on their own. When I decided to voice my opinion on a writing style they didn’t enjoy nor felt was professional (their exact words was that it was cheap and easy), techniques used by famous writers such as Wilbur Smith, Clive Cussler and James Patterson, I lost their favour. Things quickly went south because I didn’t share the common opinion.

    Needless to say I left the group. They went on a spree of trying to taint my name with others, but I’ve moved on and published more novels in the meantime. This doesn’t mean that I can’t play nicely with others. I joined NaNoWriMo in 2015 and met local writers and we have an online chatgroup on our phones. Sure, we often disagree too, but it is taken well in the spirit of things. We’ve taught each other a lot, and many of them have been published in the mean while. They’ve often come to me for advice on how to proceed with their writing.

    Gosh, this has become a post on it own. Haha. In summary, I agree with you. In any form of life, I prefer playing the solo campaign than going multiplayer. Sometimes it’s just easier that way.

    Liked by 1 person


    1. The important thing to remember is that it’s fine to disagree with people. Hell, my wife and I disagree sometimes, but we are able to articulate our opinions when we do, and we respect each other.

      I’m glad that you were able to find a good group for your writing by the way. Having people to talk to about creative endeavors is pretty important. I’ve heard about NaNoWriMo actually, and it sounds like a good resource for writers.

      Personally, I do prefer single player games, though I’ve been known to dive into multiplayer if it grabs my attention. Mass Effect 3, Titanfall, Watch_Dogs, Rainbow Six, The Division, and Dying Light were all good to me, though obviously I ran into issues with difficult people on occasion. Luckily I can just disconnect and drop out though!

      Liked by 2 people


  2. Reblogged this on CELENIC EARTH.



  3. Similar experiences with both tabletop and video gaming. The most rewarding experiences have always been the ones in which the group found ways around their differences, in-game and out, to ensure everyone had an enjoyable experience. The scenario regarding the dragon is a quick illustration of poor DM’ing, not to mention concerning group dynamics. Had it been the beginning of the session or previously discussed, then I could perhaps understand pushing forward then prior to the next session working your character choices. However, with only 15 minutes left and such an incredible moment in the story arc, it would have been senseless to continue. Anyway, my rant aside, I am glad you have a solid second group to fall back on.

    Liked by 1 person


    1. I can understand them wanting to continue playing, but there was a clear breakdown in communication there. Jennifer was a little cranky for having to play my character without me to consult on it (and I don’t blame her one bit). However, they pressed the issue of continuing to play since the DM and group were worried that they wouldn’t get to play the next week if I wasn’t able to attend (since my boss tends to not make the schedule until the day before the week it covers). After the attempt to coerce her to keep playing, she had to say no, and left abruptly.

      I mean, I get it. I love playing and schedules can be a pain to work around, but they played through an important part of my character’s backstory without me and were confused when I showed up for the next session and didn’t know what happened or what to do. They asked what I wanted to do with a prisoner that they had left alive at the end of the session and were puzzled when I chose to just move on. I should probably take the time to work things out, but it feels a little like it’s just time to move on from that, campaign be damned.

      Thank you for commenting by the way!

      Liked by 1 person


  4. […] Here not too long ago, I wrote a little snippet about my frustration with one of my D&D groups. Well, I drew some help from my wife in writing it, but I didn’t vent really (or did I?). […]



  5. Robert Ian Shepard February 4, 2017 at 19:53

    Great article! Having recently undergone a similar experience, I identify a lot with this. I usually DM when playing tabletops, so I think for me one thing to work on would be establishing the expectations you discussed (what is everyone’s role, what does the “norm” look like for us) BEFORE issues arise. A big example of this from my experience is with guests – while I always welcome anyone who wants to try out a tabletop game, folks who want to “just sit and hang out” always end up distracting everybody and making the night rather unpleasant. I discourage it as a result, but without fail whenever I start playing with a new group I forget to establish that standard and so it becomes a big issue later on. Discussing ground rules beforehand is definitely a key factor in creating a successful gaming group!

    Liked by 1 person


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.